This article originally appeared on Time.
On Tuesday, the Texas state senate gave initial approve to a bill that would require people to use restrooms and other facilities that match the gender on their birth certificate. The vote, 21 to 10 largely along party lines, came after a contentious five-hour debate in which opponents of the bill argued that the measure will hurt transgender people and supporters argued that it is necessary for privacy and safety. A final vote is likely to occur Wednesday.
The primary sponsor of the bill, Republican Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, gave an emotive speech to begin the debate around noon local time, taking issue with the notion that the bill is a solution in search of a problem, as many of her Democratic colleagues alleged.
“I will tell you as a woman, this is not a joke. This is about dressing rooms, lockers, showers and restrooms. This is about privacy and protection for all people,” Kolkhorst said. “It’s not perfect. It’s not easy when we talk about these issues. Cisgender. Transgender. How many genders are there? Are we created man and woman? Or do we internalize something different?”
The bill, known as SB6, would affect facilities in public schools, universities and government buildings, though not private businesses. The measure says the use of single-sex facilities should be based on “biological sex” and defines that as the sex listed on one’s birth certificate. Of the 13 states that are considering such measures, Texas may prove to be a bellwether.
Subscribe to our daily newsletter for the latest in hair, beauty, style and celebrity news.
Kolkhorst argued that the measure is not really about transgender people but about deterring predators who might take advantage of policies that allow restroom access based on gender identity — or, as she put it at one point, “those that might in some way use a vague idea of gender identification to go into a private and intimate spaces and do harm.”
Democratic state senators grilled her for hours, asking how such a bill would be enforced and pointing out that predators have not used such policies as cover for illegal actions in the past. Several states, as well as scores of cities and university campuses, have long allowed transgender people to use restrooms based on their gender identity. But in the wake of the Supreme Court’s ruling legalizing same-sex marriage, bathroom access has become a hot-button issue in state-level fights over LGBT rights.
Some Democratic senators characterized the bill as discriminatory and said it could harm an already vulnerable population of transgender kids in the state. “Don’t you see the damage that does to kids, to be humiliated and embarrassed,” said state Sen. Sylvia Garcia, “because they can’t use the bathroom of the gender they identify with?”
Bills in other states have defined “biological sex” in terms that include chromosomes and anatomy. Supporters of the Texas bill repeatedly emphasized that one’s birth certificate can be changed in Texas, suggesting that such language would allow some transgender people to still legally access the facilities that match their sense of self. But opponents of the bill pushed back, arguing that changing that marker is hard in the state because it often involves travel, legal fees and overcoming judges’ “routine” refusals to grant those requests.
“It is a pretty high bar,” Kolkhorst said.
Protesters lined the halls outside the chamber where the vote was held, armed with signs that said “Don’t Discriminate.”
If the measure earns final approval, it will then move to the state House of Representatives for possible consideration. This vote came after a marathon committee hearing that lasted nearly 21 hours the previous week, where pastors, parents, schoolchildren, state officials, medical professionals and hundreds of others signed up to speak for and against the bill. Many young transgender people also came to speak during the hearing.
Kolkhorst said she was moved to propose the bill after the Obama Administration issued guidance last year instructing schools to respect the gender identities of transgender students, guidance that the Trump Administration has since rescinded. And she characterized the bill as creating “objectivity” about gender that the Obama-era guidance lacked. “I’ve learned through these months,” she said. “It isn’t as simple as male and female anymore.”